Presentations
|
COMMUNICATIONS |
|
|
|
||
|
Invited Lectures |
|
|
|
||
|
IL–1 |
Eurachem – how it began |
|
Williams, A. |
||
|
IL–2 |
What Eurachem has achieved |
|
Walsh, M. |
||
|
IL–3 |
The measurement cycle |
|
Wegscheider, W. |
||
|
IL–4 |
Setting the measurement requirement |
|
Silva, R.B. |
||
|
IL–5 |
Method validation and verification |
|
Sibbesen, L. |
||
|
IL–6 |
Recovery/bias evaluation |
|
Leito, I. |
[PDF, 0.6 Mb]; URL |
|
|
IL–7 |
Proficiency Testing (PT)–a tool to improve laboratory performance |
|
Brookman, B. |
||
|
IL–8 |
Traceability in chemical analysis – Are we ready to deliver? |
|
Emons, H. |
||
|
IL–9 |
Uncertainty evaluation for analysis and sampling |
|
Ellison, S. |
||
|
IL–10 |
Reporting the result and assessment for compliance |
|
Magnusson, B. |
||
|
IL–11 |
QA/QC to underpin the measurement cycle |
|
Bianco, P. |
||
|
IL–12 |
Key skills for the analytical scientist: Assessing competence in the laboratory |
|
Barwick, V. |
||
|
IL–13 |
Where next |
|
Camões, M.F. |
|
|
|
Oral Communications |
|
|
|
||
|
OC–1 |
JRC contribution to the fitness for purpose of analytical methods for food and feed matrices |
|
Cordeiro, F.; Fiamegkos, I.; Robouch, P.; Calle, B. |
|
|
|
OC–2 |
Assessment of the determination of total sulphur in fertilizers by ICP-OES |
|
Nunes, M.J.; M. João Moura |
|
|
|
OC–3 |
Use of interlaboratory study to better define the characteristics of dispersion of results in natural gas analysis |
|
Vatin, A.; Vial, J.; Leininger, J.P.; Jardy, A. – Presented by Basset, E. |
|
|
|
OC–4 |
Assessing a new approach (triple A-classification) to evaluate performance-underperformance of laboratories participating in the EU proficiency tests for multi-residue analysis of pesticides in fruits and vegetables |
|
Valverde, A.; Fernández-Alba, A.; Aguilera, A.; Mezcua, M. |
|
|
|
OC–5 |
Specifications and traceability in the pharmaceutical industry |
|
Nielsen, E.; Byrialsen, K.; Jespersen, A.; Adamczewski, L. |
||
|
OC–6 |
Estimation of measurement uncertainty in the fluorometric determination of ammoniacal nitrogen in sea water by continuous flow analysis (CFA) |
|
Claramunt, I.; Perez, L. |
|
|
|
OC–7 |
NMIJ analytical skill-upgrade training program |
|
Chiba, K.; Inagaki, K.; Huroiwa, T. |
|
|
|
OC–8 |
Quality assurance of chemical analysis: classification, modeling and quantification of human errors |
|
Kuselman, I. |
||
|
OC–9 |
Courses of study and interest-based subjects |
|
Camões, M.F. |
|
|
|
OC–10 |
Training needs to understand quality assurance |
|
Tsimillis, K. |
||
|
Posters |
|
|
|
||
|
P–1 |
Accuracy in niacin quantification in food matrices, by an RP-HPLC method |
|
Flores, C.; Dias, M.G.; Santos, M. |
||
|
P–2 |
Method validation of heavy metals such as arsenic, lead and cadmium in meat and meat products by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry |
|
Abbasova, T.; Kamalova, S.; Hamidullazade, A.; Hassanova, S. |
|
|
|
P–3 |
Uncertainty sources at the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantification in gas chromatography and comprehensive two dimensional gas chromatography |
|
Májek, P.; Krupčík, J. |
|
|
|
P–4 |
Validation of copper and mercury in marine sediments |
|
Palma, C.; Valença, M.; Gama, A.; Santos, P. |
|
|
|
P–5 |
Comparison of pressurized liquid extraction and soxhlet extraction for the determination of organic pollutants in marine sediments |
|
Santos, P.; Gama, A.; Valença, M.; Palma, C. |
|
|
|
P–6 |
Establishment of a model to estimate the uncertainties associated to the measurement of atmospheric pollutants in a crude refinery |
|
Dias, F.; Matos, M. |
|
|
|
P–7 |
Performance of the method EN 12396-1 – with the introduction of minor modifications – versus the criteria of SANCO 12571/2013 for quantitative determinations |
|
Luz, S.; Santos, T., Silva, R.B. |
||
|
P–8 |
Validation of nickel quantitative analysis using ICP-OES with an ultrasonic nebulizer |
|
Ferreira, S.; Duarte, C.; Ribeiro, S.; Sousa, I.; Coelho, M.R. |
|
|
|
P–9 |
Environmentally friendly matrix effect matching evaluation for the major elements in solid biofuel characterization by atomic absorption spectrometry |
|
Trancoso, M.; Lopes, H.; Teixeira, P.; Calisto, S. |
|
|
|
P–10 |
Monitoring laboratory performance over time from proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons |
|
Trancoso, M.; Sousa, A.; Calisto, S. |
|
|
|
P–11 |
European proficiency tests for fruit and vegetables from 1996 to 2013 – History and main achievements |
|
Uclés, S.; Belmonte, N.; Ferrer, C.; Gómez-Ramos, M.; Herrera, S.; Lozano, A.; Malato, O.; Medina, P.; Mezcua, M.; Rajski, Ł.; Uclés, A.; Fernández-Alba, A. |
|
|
|
P–12 |
Achieving lower z-scores: evaluation of z-score results along the uncertainty range of a sample |
|
Jesuino, B.; Freitas, A. |
|
|
|
P–13 |
Estimation of the minimal preanalytical uncertainty |
|
Sylte, M.; Wentzel-Larsen, T.; Bolann, B. |
|
|
|
P–14 |
COMAR – the international database for certified reference materials |
|
Steiger, T.; Pradel R. |
|
|
|
P–15 |
Quantification of FAMEs in biodiesel: flame ionization detection vs. isotope dilution mass spectrometry |
|
Morales, V.; Buchgraber, M.; Held, A. |
|
|
|
P – 16 |
Implementing VIM3 calibration in some analytical chemistry laboratories |
|
Pellegrino, O.; Furtado, A.; Oliveira, C.S.; Filipe, E. |
|
|
|
P – 17 |
Uncertainty from sample preparation in laboratory on the example of various feeds |
|
Korol, W.; Bielecka, G.; Rubaj, J.; Walczyński, S. |
|
|
|
P – 18 |
The prospect of the TILSAM method regarding customer needs and benefits in view of existing gas CMCs |
|
Werhahn, O.; Nwaboh, J.; Pogány, A.; Koelliker-Delgado, J.; Schiel, D.; Ebert, V. |
|
|
|
P – 19 |
Variability of uncertainty associated to heavy metals determination in urban soils |
|
Silva, H.; Silva, N.; Oliveira, C.; Matos, M. |
|
|
|
P – 20 |
Measurement quality in the determination of iron content in ore |
|
Lindera, K. |
|
|
|
P – 21 |
Validation of the quantification of Mitragynine in Kratom by HPLC-DAD |
|
Lopes, A.; Gómez, M.; Silva, R.B.; Gaspar, H. |
||
|
P – 22 |
Validation of the quantification of Cathinones in “plant feeders” by 1H qNMR |
|
Lopes, R.; Brito, M.; Gaspar, H.; Silva, R.B. |
||
|
P – 23 |
Optimisation of the efficiency gain quantification of the catalytic photodegradation of methylene blue |
|
Rosa, N.; Silva, R.B.; Camões, M.F.; Monteiro, O.C. |
||
|
P – 24 |
A comparison study on the uncertainty evaluation for the determination of total nitrogen, using ISO 11352 and other alternative approaches |
|
Sousa, J.A.; Reynolds, A.; Ribeiro, A. |
|
|
|
P – 25 |
Assessment of the compatibility of mean activity coefficients estimated experimentally and by Pitzer equations |
|
Anes, B.; Silva, R.B.; Martins, H.; Camões, M.F. |
|
|
|
P – 26 |
Uncertainty associated with the measurement of mineral micropollutants in natural waters and in waste waters: differences observed between analytical methods during proficiency testing schemes |
|
De Kuyssche, D.; Charpentier, R.; Penhoat, M.; Courtade, E.; Guarini, P. |
||
|
P – 27 |
Evaluation of performance of handheld XRF analyzer and possibilities for use in quantitative assessment |
|
Jönsson, M. |
||
|
P – 28 |
The quality system and metrology in chemistry: HR University training |
|
Fertonani, F.L.; Pastrea, I.A.; Hojo, O.; Batistuti, J.P.; Furlan, E.G.; Santos, C.C. |
|
|
|
P – 29 |
TrainMiC® a steadily growing and sustainable learning community |
|
Taylor, P. |
|
|